Showing posts with label Social Interaction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Social Interaction. Show all posts

Thursday, 9 July 2015

Spooks
(Series 7)
(2008)

Also Known As:
MI-5
Year:
2008
Country:
United Kingdom…
Predominant Genre:
Thriller
Directors:
Directors…
Outstanding Performances:
None
Premiss:
Missions of the UK’s domestic intelligence organization.
Themes:
Alienation
Christianity
Corporate Power
Courage
Destiny
Emotional repression
Ethnicity
Friendship
Identity
Loneliness
Loyalty
Materialism
Narcissism
Nationality
Nostalgia
Personal
Political
Political Correctness
Republicanism
Sadomasochism
Schizophrenia
Self-belief
Social class
Snobbery
Solipsism
The State
Stereotyping
White culture
White guilt
White supremacy
Similar to:
Homeland
Review Format:
DVD

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.

Caucasians will Save the Day - but only in Fiction.

Political Correctness Gone Mad.

Summary: Eurocentric and Imperialistic Caucasians Pretending they can Defeat an Enemy Without Knowing his Motivations while Doctors are unlikely to Defeat a Disease without Epidemiology.

Series about loyalty to Whites as well as to the rich who continue to expect those most loyal to them to risk their lives for little return.

Whites are shown as being so enmeshed in White supremacy that they fully-realize they will never be accepted by any other ethnic group and so are prepared to die to defend their own - even if this means doing so for people who think them socially-inferior. They are given no social alternative (& are social cowards, anyway), so this is the only sense of human loyalty they will ever know - no matter how false. No clue is ever offered as to why Whites engage in such a perversely-masochistic fidelity to others when there is so little to gain from it.

Whites hate being labeled as racist, yet are only too keen to label others by alleged group affiliation as madmen or jumped-up little fanatics; under-estimating the very enemy that has thrust so much fear into their hearts in order to vainly reduce the dread of terror they spend so much time and money trying to defeat.

No political context is ever offered for the events shown since that would mean the White response to terrorism is more of the same kind of behavior being condemned, as well as the direct cause of the terrorism the characters in the series are ostensibly fighting.

The childish political simplifications of the scripting aptly-reflect the White, cry-baby narcissism of those who refuse to accept their responsibility for the terror they claim to fight as well as the fact that they find second-guessing the terrorists they have created difficult-to-impossible. (There is even the absurd claim that there was only one Cold War, when all of the periods of peace between all of the wars were cold wars.)

Like everyone who fights a losing war, this series pretends threats can be neutralized by fictionalizing them into non-existence. Whites conflate Ethnicity with Nationality to enable their support for White supremacy and its handmaiden Political-Correctness - but what will protect us from White supremacy? No one answers this question because the series supports White supremacy by being promotional propaganda for the UK Security Service, despite the fact that it contains no admission that the so-called War on Terror is a Race war - fought solely for the benefit of rich Whites.

Whites are shown as melodramatically-brave, gratuitously-violent and violently-traumatized by the existential despair they try to inflict upon others via their eloquently-martial cultures. The White characters are fleshed-out to reveal shared suffering (rather than shared joy) as the basis for White culture - a culture lacking in substantive content; hence, the White emotional dissociation here offered as espionage cool; eg, angry enough to aggressively kill, but psychopathically-unemotional immediately afterward.

The largely-mediocre actors struggle to embody their two-dimensional characters sufficiently to make us care about what happens to them. They fail; leaving us stranded in a quagmire of melodramatic gimmicks, narrative clichés and over-acting typical of Western media in its quest for false-certainty and forced-uniformity. Its images are designed to be seen as colorless accounts of knowledge, reality, morality and human nature; while unintentionally and simultaneously revealing how biased and one-sided they are.

In no other major civilization do self-regard, self-congratulation and denigration of others run as deep, nor have these tendencies infected as many aspects of White thinking, laws and policy, as they have in the West - and its overseas extensions. Thus, preventive measures against terrorism are actually impossible for Whites since they cannot study People Of Color (POC) without first denying the humanity of the latter with a political intellectualism bent on self-affirmation rather than objective study. POC are thus never to be understood and, thus, never to be defeated through an understanding of their weaknesses, flaws & motivations. Only by great good luck could the scenarios this series offers ever come-to-pass so that one day Whites will be able to live without the fear of the bombers they have created.

Ultimately, this is not a show offering much hope that the Security Services can protect us from the terror they have been instrumental in creating, since its solutions are purely Curative rather than Preventive.

Really quite laughable.


Copyright © 2015 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://whiteliberals.blogspot.com) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Saturday, 4 April 2015

White Supremacy

Year:
2015
Outstanding Performances:
ente…
V. Smith…
Premiss:
We do not care what color you are, so long as it is White.
Themes:
Alienation
Destiny
Emotional repression
Ethnicity
Free Speech
Identity
Loneliness
Materialism
Narcissism
Nostalgia
Political Correctness
Republicanism
Sexual Repression
Solipsism
Stereotyping
White culture
White guilt
White supremacy
Similar to:
@whitewhines
White Whine

More White Whine with Your Fish?

Thin-skinned Caucasians playing the Race Card of believing only they possess a right to Free Speech

Response to these Claims of Playing the Race Card:

Statements made to others that are apolitical are White delusions: They do not exist because all communication with others is political. White statements decrying politics are, in themselves, political; while making claims without evidence is just as bigoted as Whites are when regarding those with whom they do not agree. White Identity politics (ie, White supremacy) is the solipsism that pretends it is not the least bit political; while serving the all-important political end of White reality-evasion.

If, for example, Frank TALKER wrote a review of the movie Casablanca without mentioning Hitler, Nazi Germany and White totalitarianism, the PC-brigade would be happy. However, Frank TALKER lives in the real world, not the Hollywood one.

Projection & Displacement

Whites invented the People Of Color (POC)-only Race Card to allege POC gain an advantage from using it - without explicitly stating what that advantage might be, save to suggest POC exploit it to hide their own cultural and personal flaws. POC can never benefit from any kind of Race Card when POC control no institutions in any White culture in any of the 52 White-ruled countries of the globe - unlike Whites (eg, by claiming the Race Card is being played by their enemies whenever Whites are criticized for playing the Whites-only Race Card).

Whites are playing the (their) Race Card at exactly the moment they claim others are, to pretend White supremacy does not exist; the Race Card being one of the many negative products of White Guilt and an example of racism, in itself. As a rape victim cannot play the non-existent gender card, playing the Race Card is precisely the kind of argument pedophiles and rapists use when confronted with their victims: “She was asking for it”.

White free speech

Whites take political commentary personally because their culture conflates such things as the Personal with the Political; the Public with the Private; Ethnicity with Nationality; Correlations with Causations; to more easily cheat people into working for a social acceptance - from Whites - that never comes and is never intended to.

Whites demand that any discussion of White supremacy be umpired by Whites - to achieve their desired goal of not feeling guilty about how they benefit from unearned privilege (& then blaming POC for the impossibility of achieving such a goal). Hence, the White invention of a psychologically-soothing Race Card that, somehow, can only be played by POC since, when Whites play it (via White supremacy), that is just how things are (& are supposed to be). If Whites feel bad, POC are playing the Race Card; if Whites feel good, POC have learned their lowly place in the great White scheme of things. A Card that only Whites can play is an example of the only racial equality Whites preach: The unfounded allegation that POC are equally racist when compared to Whites.

“Reverse Racism”

Hardly surprising, then, that Whites think the only equity possible between ethnic groups is their own negativity toward the ethnicity of others - as well as their own ethnicity, which they frequently deny possessing. Because Whites think POC possess no positive qualities, Whites invented the similarly non-existent (& for the same reasons outlined in this posting) concept of “Reverse Racism” - as if that could possibly make White racism seem reasonable and justified. A concept not based on irrational fear, but cultural self-defense.

“Blaming the Victim”

The White claim of POC playing the Race Card allows Whites to benefit from the Whites-only Race Card by implying all complaints of White supremacy are inherently false; making all White claims about POC, thus, inherently true. The Race Card serves the dual purpose of allowing Whites to perpetuate the political benefits of being openly-racist (the only way in which racism flourishes to maximum White advantage) while simultaneously-denying that those very benefits even exist. It is a Card only Whites can use and helps assuage guilt for evil actions by pretending such actions are justified.

White guilt

Because there are no rational arguments in favor of racism, the Race Card is simply a desperate White means for evading debate about the benefits all Whites receive from White supremacy. The White hope is that White Guilt will recede, but the universal (guilt-induced) anger with which Whites make such claims proves this political gambit does not work; only making matters worse for Whites - both psychologically and politically.

The power of the White claim that POC play the Race Card is really the power of paralyzing White Guilt; the inevitable product and direct result of the inherent amorality of the various White cultures. Thus, Whites are clearly more concerned with White Guilt than they are with POC lives: So long as non-one mentions the Racewar, Whites could not care less.

Xenophobia

The urge to stereotype others is strong in Whites because it helps them feel they have overcome their fear of others (by inventing comforting delusions about the automatic inferiority of those others). It also convinces Whites they need not listen to anyone other than themselves in their belief that they possess a right to deny others the same rights they demand for themselves; eg, so-called Free Speech (ie, the right to offend people for being different). Whites only favor Free Speech when it flatters Whites.

Political Correctness

Whites need, desperately, to live in a contextless political vacuum in the hope that no blame attaches to them for anything, whatsoever, and everything that happens, anywhere, can be blamed on someone else (eg, 9/11 had nothing to do with Whites unwanted interference in the internal affairs of sovereign Arab states for the past 70 years); rendering political commentary as inevitable as it is necessary. Under the tenets of Free Speech, such commentary cannot - reasonably - be disallowed except by political correctoids - who actually wish to escape the politics they preach; that is, to escape the limitations of reality. The White definition of Free Speech requires the invented distraction of a Race Card (& its necessary handmaiden, Political Correctness) to evade the fact that Free Speech for those darker-skinned than Whites is under constant attack - from Whites.

Political-correctoids are not free agents, so never act like ones. They fool themselves into thinking they can tell others how to think, speak & behave. They have no substantive arguments and simply rely on reality-evasion to psychologically-support their own empty lifestyles that are built on nothing more than metaphysical, epistemological & ethical sand. It is Whites who posses the cultural and personal flaws the invention of the Race Card is meant to conceal.

Dr. Evil

Whites live their lives on the basis that their obsession with fantasy is more important than reality. Their talk is all despair at finding the world will not conform to their übermensch desires; hence, their wish to compartmentalize experience in such a way that real-life is successfully-elided - at least in their Bond villain dreams of world domination (eg, the World Bank & the IMF).

This White schizophrenia accounts for Whites’ endless, unjustified complaints when others do not think, act or talk as they do. And for Whites making false claims about others without evidence. And for Whites’ need to mock others - who can see right through them with the weapons of irony, satire & sarcasm. And for Whites’ need to destroy competition rather than win-out against it in a fair fight.

It is not necessary to agree with others – that is the totalitarian dream represented by Political-Correctness. It is, after all, a simple matter to refrain from engaging with that which one finds disagreeable or to disassociate oneself from those with whom one is not compatible. But that would mean accepting others’ right to self-determination - something Whites find impossible.

The real world

Non-Whites and Jews avoid Whites precisely because they do not wish to be killed, mocked or brainwashed by those same Whites; hence, White resentment when a White supremacy alert (what Whites disparagingly call: Playing the Race Card) is issued by POC against any product of White culture. Few find Whites trustworthy; making Whites feel lonely and psychologically-adrift as human beings. (One of the curious by-products of Whiteness is the White penchant for pet-ownership, along with the search for extraterrestrial life - to counter their self-willed, lonely-at-the-top existential and terrestrial ennui - rather than adopting the simpler expedient of making friends here on Earth with their fellow humans.)

Ultimately, the Race Card is a card Whites designed that only People of Color are alleged to play; but from which only Whites can benefit: “Heads I Win; Tails You Lose”. The mere claim of playing the Race Card is the only way the Race Card can ever be successfully played.


Copyright © 2015 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://whiteliberals.blogspot.com) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Thursday, 12 February 2015

‘[M]isplaced political correctness’

White Hypocrisy

The usual White supremacist claptrap:

  1. There is no such thing as “misplaced political correctness”, since all political correctness (PC) is a misplaced attempt by Whites to conceal White guilt;
  2. Whites never claimed the 50-year cover-up of Jimmy Savile’s pedophilia was the result of PC because he was White and enjoyed all the unfair advantages pertaining thereto;
  3. It would be better for Whites if their public institutions employed more People of Color (POC) who, with their greater cultural awareness, are better placed to intervene in such cases; alleviating Whites of the heavy burden of the guilt that persuades them to prefer not being thought-of as racist than act when a crime is committed - but that would mean employing more POC: Something Whites stubbornly refuse to do; &,
  4. Because most pedophiles are White, it is only right and proper that Whites be targeted more than any other ethnic group.

Copyright © 2015 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://whitespeak.blogspot.com) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Monday, 9 February 2015

What Would It Take?

(2010)

White People are the Best People

Summary: Critique of What Would It Take?.

The usual conflation and confusion of the terms America with White, along with the claim that there is a Darwinian race for survival between different ethnic groups despite the lack of any evidence for this.

The author never explains why the decline of White culture is a problem other than to pretend that the world would be worse off without Whites.

This writer resents anyone not White and assumes they will all treat Whites as badly as Whites have always treated them - a claim made without any evidence.

He chooses not to see his White supremacy as a form of the very Positive Discrimination he rails against; merely seeing it as natural and normal and the way things are.

If not natural, then his version of what is natural should be enforced in his implication that it is best to:

  1. Keep White women at home as brood mares to keep Whites numerically superior;
  2. only allowing Whites to migrate to the US;
  3. abolishing divorce;
  4. anti-miscegenation laws; &
  5. criminalizing any sexual congress between members of different ethnic groups.

Like all those without a valid cultural identity, he desperately needs to believe that White culture is somehow universal; while refraining from learning the obvious lesson of his own claims of White decline: White inferiority. He is happy to see Whites always numerically-dominant, but hates to see anyone else dominate because of theirs. A man with no moral compass who refuses to encourage Whites to work harder to compensate for their failings but, instead, to penalize non-Whites for their successes - which he clearly believes are unearned and only come about because of Affirmative Action - again, without any supporting evidence.

Like all racists, his only recourse is to whine, since he has no solution to Whites’ increasing global irrelevance.


Copyright © 2015 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://whiteliberals.blogspot.com) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Tuesday, 3 February 2015

White Ghettoism

(2009)

Purpose of White Ghettoes

A Good White Town. A Good Clean White Town. A Good White Town to Live In and a Good White Place to Raise Your White Children.

Yet, beneath the tranquil small town exterior is a roiling inferno of fraud, corruption, treachery, hypocrisy, class warfare & ill-suppressed sex of all varieties: Adultery, sadism, homosexuality & incest.

Whites are volcanoes who have to keep a lot of White guilt hidden to believe themselves superior. The slightest thing can set them off, so steer clear.


Copyright © 2015 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://whiteliberals.blogspot.co.uk) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Tuesday, 15 April 2014

How to Suppress Discussions of Racism

(2006)

It is not White supremacy Whites wish to destroy, only the critics of White supremacy...



Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://whiteliberals.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Left in Dark Times

(2008)



A Stand Against the New Barbarism

The New Barbarism blames the victims for their own condition and so tries to justify White supremacy...


Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://whiteliberals.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Wednesday, 9 April 2014

British debate over veils

(2006)



The usual White supremacy when Whites are confronted with what they refuse to understand...



Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://whiteliberals.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Thursday, 13 March 2014

Blame-shifting

(2009)



A bigger kid did it...



Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://whiteliberals.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Tuesday, 4 March 2014

Is the white anti-racist an oxymoron?

(2011)



Yes!



Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://whiteliberals.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Sunday, 2 March 2014

Growing Up Black
(2009)



True ontogeny...



Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://whiteliberals.blogspot.com) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Thursday, 27 February 2014

White Guide to Writing History
(2012)


The world revolves around them...



Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://whiteliberals.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Saturday, 22 February 2014

Black People According to White

(2010)



Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://whiteliberals.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Wednesday, 19 February 2014

“Go back to Africa”

(2009)



Go back to school...



Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://whiteliberals.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Tuesday, 18 February 2014

White Man’s Burden
(2006)

RATING:60%
FORMAT:Book



Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done so Much Ill and so Little Good

Interesting book about Whites and their inability to find a means of effectively helping the Third World; resulting from the White inability to see beyond the profound institutional limitations of both Foreign Aid or Military Intervention - and, indeed, their own limited culture.

Because it is written by a White, he is unable to be honest about the endemic malice and condescension of Whites toward non-Whites. Generalized vindictiveness that causes them to create poverty-reduction plans Whites know are not going to work: Plans designed to disincentivize large-scale migration of Third World poor and to prevent non-Whites from becoming economic competitors in global Capitalism. The War on Terror makes things worse because Whites imagine (as they do regarding their own countries’ crime rates) that terrorism is caused by poverty. That the causes of terrorism are actually the self-same foreign intervention (supposedly designed to alleviate poverty) is conveniently and deliberately elided.

The book also fails to compare - in depth - Foreign Aid with Domestic Welfare such that the similar reasons for the failure of both remain unilluminated. Moreover, White guilt and White narcissism are not assigned their due place in explaining why Whites want to save the world, but have no plan for saving the world from Whites. Whites wish to recreate the world in their own image and so fantasize about being Aryan supermen: The only kind of people Whites imagine can achieve such goals. Utopian for Whites; Dystopian for everyone else. Rather than look at the actual problems of others, Whites choose to see others only in comparison to themselves; presenting a distorted view of objective reality.

The author’s political naivety stems from a belief in the essential goodness of Whites, a belief that only Whites, themselves, possess. As well as their neurotic inability to divorce Intentions from Acts such that preaching what to do becomes a greater goal than actually doing anything. Whites seek a mirror in which to permanently admire themselves; ignoring the suffering they claim to be alleviating as the only means of evading their own inner emptiness. This is why Whites rarely focus on outcomes but on intentions, since positive outcomes are harder to find.

The author’s realization that self-directed and organic development is the only way forward for the world’s poor (as practiced in the First World) is likely to go unheeded. Detested Whites (like Bob Geldof & Bono) are far too keen to publicly remain at the center of their own vain pipe-dreams of sainthood than they are to actually listen to the poor. Helping the world’s poor by funding the poor’s own ideas for development - since the poor are the only people who understand the situation on the ground because of their daily experience of it - keeps Whites from hogging the limelight and, hence, is not favored by them.


Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://whiteliberals.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Friday, 14 February 2014

Numéro Does Blackface – Again



What Whites think of Blacks...


Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://whiteliberals.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Saturday, 8 February 2014

Giardino dei Finzi-Contini
(1970)

RATING:80%
FORMAT:DVD



[Garden of the Finzi-Continis]

Engaging film about the banality of evil and White moral evasion in the face of the underlying White supremacy of their culture and its effects on their ability to be happy and that of others simply to continue existing. Here, Whites retreat into a literal fantasy Eden in order to banish thoughts of the real world from their desired carefree existences.

Film is also about the White emotional control needed to live within the political limitations of a culture as ethically-limited as White culture; conforming their emotions and friendships to the prevailing political orthodoxy, such that Whites appear as hollow-eyed in their personal relationships as they do in their political ones.

White politics makes personal relationships impossible because of this desired emotional repression, since Whites have to conflate the Personal with the Political to achieve social acceptance; making Fascism an inevitably White psychological illness and morbid obsession. By abandoning the needs and benefits of the Family to those of the State, Whites doom themselves to La Gabbia.

Fascinating as a companion-piece to Il Conformista.


Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://whiteliberals.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

OBAMISTAN!
Land Without Racism:
Your Guide to the New America
(2010)

RATING:80%
FORMAT:Book



Amusing and accurate satire on non-Black culture.


Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://whiteliberals.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.